For most rental-property owners, I’d start with the eufy Security Smart Lock C220: its fingerprint access and built-in Wi-Fi can simplify entry management without requiring a separate hub. The Kwikset Halo Wi-Fi is a strong alternative for owners who want remote access from a familiar lock brand, while the TEEHO TE001 suits landlords who mainly need a straightforward keypad deadbolt. The main tradeoff is between convenient remote control and simpler hardware with fewer connected features; door fit, guest-code management, and ongoing upkeep matter just as much as the feature list. A lock that works well for one owner-occupied home may be awkward across several rentals. Read on for the full breakdown and guidance on matching a lock to your property and turnover routine.
Get the latest gadgets delivered free with Prime
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
- Member-only deals all year
Complete the kit
Key Takeaways
- Remote access separates connected picks from basic keypad locks: the eufy C220, Kwikset Halo, and other Wi-Fi models can serve owners who need to manage entry away from the property, while the TEEHO TE001 is a simpler choice for code-based access.
- Fingerprint entry is not the same as rental-ready access management: it may speed up entry for a regular occupant, but temporary or changing guest codes are often a better fit for rotating tenants.
- Hub requirements change the setup: the Kwikset HomeConnect 620 uses Z-Wave, so its remote-control value depends on compatible hub equipment rather than a direct Wi-Fi connection.
- Feature-rich locks bring more upkeep decisions: camera-equipped myQ models, rechargeable batteries, solar charging, and connected features can add convenience, but also make power, network, and privacy planning more important.
- Door compatibility narrows the field before features do: handle sets, deadbolts, exterior dimensions, and smart-home standards vary across the 15 picks, so checking the actual door and existing setup should come before choosing a favorite.
| Sifely S Fingerprint Smart Door Lock with Keypad and Handle |  | Best for Flexible Guest Entry | Entry methods: Fingerprint, keypad, app, FOB, physical key | Connectivity: Bluetooth; Wi-Fi via optional gateway | Voice assistant compatibility: Alexa and Google Assistant with optional Wi-Fi Gateway | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| TEEHO TE001 Keyless Entry Keypad Deadbolt, Matte Black |  | Best Value for Code-Only Rentals | Access codes: 20 user codes and 1 temporary single-use code | Auto-lock delay: 10–99 seconds; off by default | Power: 4 AA batteries, not included | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| eufy Security Smart Lock C220 with Fingerprint Entry and Built-in Wi-Fi |  | Best for Remote Management Without a Hub | Model: T8506 | Unlock methods: Fingerprint, app, keypad, physical key, Apple Watch, Alexa or Google voice assistant | Connectivity: Built-in Wi-Fi; no bridge required | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Kwikset Halo Wi-Fi Smart Lock with Touchscreen Keypad, Venetian Bronze |  | Best for High-Turnover Properties | Connectivity: Built-in Wi-Fi; no hub required | Entry methods: Touchscreen access code, app, physical key, voice control | Maximum access codes: 250 | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| myQ Secure View 3-in-1 Smart Lock with Rechargeable Battery |  | Best for Entry and Doorway Monitoring | Model: MYQ-NE0BXAB1 | Access methods: Face recognition, fingerprint, PIN, app, key | PIN capacity: Up to 16 PINs | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Yamiry YR01 Smart Fingerprint Door Lock with Keypad |  | Best for Flexible Guest Access | Model: YR01 | Unlock methods: Fingerprint, Bluetooth app, passcode, key fob, mechanical key, Alexa with separately sold Wi-Fi gateway | Included key fobs: 2 | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Kwikset HomeConnect 620 Z-Wave Keypad Smart Lock, Polished Brass |  | Best for High-Turnover Rentals | Model: HomeConnect 620 Traditional, 98695-003 | Connectivity: Z-Wave 700 Long Range; compatible hub required | Security: S2 encryption; Grade 2 BHMA certified | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Veise VE017 Fingerprint Smart Door Lock with App Control, Matte Black |  | Best for Activity Tracking | Model: VE017 | Unlock methods: Fingerprint, app, authorized access, fob card, PIN, shared code, mechanical key; voice assistant with G1 Gateway | Auto-lock timer: 0–180 seconds | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Philips 4200 Series WiFi Keypad Deadbolt with Handle |  | Best for Hub-Free Remote Access | Model: DDL242X-1HW-L | Connectivity: 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi; no hub required | Access methods: Fingerprint, PIN code, app, Alexa, and Google Assistant | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| myQ Secure View 3-in-1 Smart Lock with 2K HDR Camera |  | Best for Video-First Entry Monitoring | Access methods: Face recognition, fingerprint, PIN, app, and key | Camera: 2K HDR | Audio: Two-way audio | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Lockin Veno Solar Fingerprint Smart Lock with Handle |  | Best for Lower-Maintenance Guest Access | Power: Built-in perovskite solar panel and 37Wh battery | Backup charging: USB-C | Unlock methods: Fingerprint, PIN code, smartphone app, voice control, mechanical key | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| ULTRALOQ Bolt SE Wi-Fi Smart Deadbolt with Matter over Thread |  | Best for Shared Access and Outdoor Exposure | Access methods: Fingerprint, passcodes, smartphone app, web portal, shared eKey/code, voice control, 2 mechanical keys | Fingerprint capacity: Up to 50 | Passcode capacity: Up to 50 | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Tapo DL100 Smart Wi-Fi Deadbolt Door Lock with Keyless Tactile Keypad |  | Best for High Guest-Code Capacity | Model: DL100 | Unlock methods: Keypad, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi app, voice control with PIN verification, 2 backup keys | Maximum access codes: 200 | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Philips Wi-Fi Smart Deadbolt Lock with Fingerprint and Keyless Entry |  | Best for Straightforward Remote Management | Model: DDL242X-1HW | Unlock methods: App, passcode, fingerprint, physical key, Alexa, Google Assistant | Wi-Fi: Built-in 2.4 GHz | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Kwikset Halo Select Wi-Fi and Matter Smart Deadbolt, Satin Nickel |  | Best for High-Security Guest-Code Management | Model: Halo Select (998000-003) | Connectivity: Wi-Fi; Matter via Thread | Smart home compatibility: Amazon Alexa, Apple Home, Google Home | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| smart lock for rental property | Connectivity | Model |
|---|---|---|
| Sifely S Fingerprint Smart Doo | Bluetooth; Wi-Fi via optional gateway | — |
| TEEHO TE001 Keyless Entry Keyp | — | — |
| eufy Security Smart Lock C220 | Built-in Wi-Fi; no bridge required | T8506 |
| Kwikset Halo Wi-Fi Smart Lock | Built-in Wi-Fi; no hub required | — |
| myQ Secure View 3-in-1 Smart L | myQ app | MYQ-NE0BXAB1 |
| Yamiry YR01 Smart Fingerprint | — | YR01 |
| Kwikset HomeConnect 620 Z-Wave | Z-Wave 700 Long Range; compatible hub required | HomeConnect 620 Traditional, 98695-003 |
| Veise VE017 Fingerprint Smart | — | VE017 |
| Philips 4200 Series WiFi Keypa | 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi; no hub required | DDL242X-1HW-L |
| myQ Secure View 3-in-1 Smart L | myQ | — |
| Lockin Veno Solar Fingerprint | Built-in Wi-Fi and Matter | — |
| ULTRALOQ Bolt SE Wi-Fi Smart D | 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi; Matter over Thread | — |
| Tapo DL100 Smart Wi-Fi Deadbol | — | DL100 |
| Philips Wi-Fi Smart Deadbolt L | — | DDL242X-1HW |
| Kwikset Halo Select Wi-Fi and | Wi-Fi; Matter via Thread | Halo Select (998000-003) |
More Details on Our Top Picks
Sifely S Fingerprint Smart Door Lock with Keypad and Handle
The Sifely S suits rentals where guests need more than one way to get inside: tenants can use a fingerprint, keypad, app, FOB, or physical key. That flexibility can help when a guest loses a code or a resident prefers not to use a phone. It also supports guest codes and access logs, giving hosts a way to manage entry between stays. Compared with the TEEHO TE001, it offers more entry choices and a handle, while the TEEHO is the simpler option if keypad codes are all you need. The main catch is that remote access and voice control require an optional Wi-Fi Gateway; Bluetooth alone does not provide remote management. Its reversible handle helps with door orientation, but fit still depends on your door matching standard installation dimensions.
Pros:- Five entry methods give tenants and guests alternatives to keypad codes.
- Guest access codes and access logs support rental turnover management.
- Reversible handle accommodates left- and right-hand doors.
- Auto-lock and one-touch locking can reduce the chance of leaving the door unsecured.
Cons:- Remote access and voice assistant control require a separately purchased Wi-Fi Gateway.
- Compatibility is described for most standard doors, so nonstandard doors need a fit check.
- A one-year warranty is shorter than the TEEHO TE001’s two-year warranty.
Best for: Rental owners who want fingerprint and keypad access, guest codes, and a handle in one lock, and are willing to add a Wi-Fi Gateway for remote management.
Not ideal for: Hosts who need remote code changes without buying an accessory, or owners whose doors fall outside standard installation compatibility.
- Entry methods:Fingerprint, keypad, app, FOB, physical key
- Connectivity:Bluetooth; Wi-Fi via optional gateway
- Voice assistant compatibility:Alexa and Google Assistant with optional Wi-Fi Gateway
- Lock type:Deadbolt
- Material and finish:Zinc; satin nickel
- Dimensions:7 x 3 x 1.12 inches
- Included keys and cards:2 keys and 2 key cards
- Warranty:1 year
Our verdict“Choose the Sifely S if varied entry methods matter more than having remote access built in.”
TEEHO TE001 Keyless Entry Keypad Deadbolt, Matte Black
The TEEHO TE001 is a straightforward pick for landlords who want to issue guest access without adding an app-connected system. It stores 20 user codes plus a temporary single-use code, so it can handle a small rental’s regular occupants and occasional visitors. Its adjustable auto-lock delay and anti-peeping keypad protection focus on useful everyday control rather than remote features. Compared with the Sifely S, this lock gives up fingerprint, app, and FOB entry, but does not depend on an optional gateway for its basic code-based operation. That simplicity comes with limits: there is no listed remote access or activity log, and the lock only fits 54 mm (2-1/8 inch) door holes. Check the bore before ordering, since doors with 38 mm holes are incompatible.
Pros:- Twenty user codes and a single-use temporary code cover routine and short-term access.
- Auto-lock delay is configurable from 10 to 99 seconds, with a one-touch locking option.
- Anti-peeping code protection helps obscure the actual code during entry.
- IP54 weather resistance and a low-battery alert suit exterior-door use.
Cons:- No remote access or app-based management is listed.
- Requires a 54 mm door hole and does not fit 38 mm holes.
- Four AA batteries are required but not included.
Best for: Owners of single-unit rentals who want straightforward guest and resident codes, local keypad operation, and automatic relocking.
Not ideal for: Hosts who need remote code management, access logs, fingerprint entry, or compatibility with a 38 mm door hole.
- Access codes:20 user codes and 1 temporary single-use code
- Auto-lock delay:10–99 seconds; off by default
- Power:4 AA batteries, not included
- Battery life:Up to 365 days
- Weather resistance:IP54
- Door hole compatibility:54 mm (2-1/8 in); not compatible with 38 mm holes
- Finish:Matte black
- Warranty:2 years
Our verdict“Pick the TEEHO TE001 when you want a simple keypad rental lock and do not need app-based oversight.”
eufy Security Smart Lock C220 with Fingerprint Entry and Built-in Wi-Fi
The eufy C220 is a strong match for hosts who want to manage a rental from afar without adding a separate bridge. Its built-in Wi-Fi supports remote app control, while fingerprint, keypad, physical key, Apple Watch, and voice assistant entry give residents several ways to unlock the deadbolt. Against the Sifely S, the C220 has Wi-Fi built in rather than requiring an optional gateway, though Sifely adds FOB entry and a handle. The C220 also includes BHMA Grade 3 certification and IP53 water resistance, but its eight AA batteries have an estimated life of up to eight months, so hosts should plan for more frequent battery checks than with the TEEHO TE001’s stated battery life. Most standard deadbolts are supported, with a spacer adjustment for bores under 54 mm.
Pros:- Built-in Wi-Fi enables remote app control without a separate bridge.
- Six listed unlocking methods give tenants and guests flexibility.
- BHMA Grade 3 certification and IP53 water resistance add relevant door-lock specifications.
- Designed for installation on most standard deadbolts without drilling.
Cons:- The stated battery life is up to eight months and can vary with usage.
- Requires eight AA batteries, more than the four used by the TEEHO TE001.
- Compatibility still depends on the existing deadbolt and bore dimensions.
Best for: Remote hosts who want built-in Wi-Fi, fingerprint access, and multiple entry choices without purchasing a separate bridge.
Not ideal for: Owners who prefer a longer stated battery interval or need a lock that includes a handle rather than a deadbolt assembly.
- Model:T8506
- Unlock methods:Fingerprint, app, keypad, physical key, Apple Watch, Alexa or Google voice assistant
- Connectivity:Built-in Wi-Fi; no bridge required
- Battery:8 AA batteries; up to 8 months
- Security certification:BHMA Grade 3
- Water resistance:IP53
- Operating temperature:-22°F to 158°F (-30°C to 70°C)
- Installation:About 15 minutes; no drilling
Our verdict“Choose the C220 if built-in remote access and fingerprint entry matter more than minimizing battery changes.”
Kwikset Halo Wi-Fi Smart Lock with Touchscreen Keypad, Venetian Bronze
The Kwikset Halo is the most code-capable choice here for a rental with many residents, cleaners, or service providers: it supports up to 250 access codes, including temporary, scheduled, and permanent guest access. Built-in Wi-Fi lets an owner manage the lock through the app without a hub, and activity alerts, geofencing, and auto-lock add oversight beyond the local keypad. Compared with the TEEHO TE001, Halo is better suited to frequent access changes and remote control; TEEHO is simpler if a small set of local codes is enough. The tradeoff is a more feature-heavy setup, and electronic components carry only a one-year warranty, despite the longer mechanical and finish coverage. Check door thickness and backset before purchase, since fit is not universal.
Pros:- Supports up to 250 access codes for guests, staff, and recurring occupants.
- Built-in Wi-Fi provides app control without a separate hub.
- Temporary, scheduled, and permanent guest access options suit changing rental stays.
- Activity alerts, geofencing, and auto-lock provide added access and locking controls.
Cons:- Electronic components have a one-year warranty.
- The larger feature set may be unnecessary for a small rental with few users.
- Door thickness and adjustable backset limits require a compatibility check.
Best for: Managers of busy rentals who need many separate codes, scheduled guest access, and remote lock control without a hub.
Not ideal for: Owners seeking a basic keypad deadbolt, or anyone whose door falls outside the listed thickness and backset ranges.
- Connectivity:Built-in Wi-Fi; no hub required
- Entry methods:Touchscreen access code, app, physical key, voice control
- Maximum access codes:250
- Door thickness:1-3/8 to 1-3/4 inches
- Adjustable deadbolt backset:2-1/8 to 2-3/4 inches
- Installation:DIY; screwdriver required
- Finish:Venetian Bronze
- Warranty:Lifetime mechanical and finish; 1 year electronics
Our verdict“Choose the Halo for rentals with many changing users who need remote control and a large code roster.”
myQ Secure View 3-in-1 Smart Lock with Rechargeable Battery
The myQ Secure View is aimed at owners who want to see and speak with visitors as well as control the deadbolt. Its combination of a smart lock, video doorbell, and 2K HDR camera can reduce the need for separate devices at the entry, with live view, motion alerts, two-way audio, and color night vision. That makes it a different proposition from the Kwikset Halo, which focuses on remote locking and managing a much larger code roster. The myQ supports up to 16 PINs and also lists face recognition and fingerprint entry, but those biometric options are unavailable in Illinois and Texas and limited to the U.S. and Canada. Buyers should also weigh the one-year limited warranty and whether they want a camera-equipped device rather than a simpler rental deadbolt.
Pros:- Combines a deadbolt, video doorbell, and 2K HDR camera in one device.
- Live view, motion alerts, two-way audio, and color night vision support doorway monitoring.
- Five listed access methods include face recognition, fingerprint, PIN, app, and key.
- myQ app controls support remote operation and PIN management.
Cons:- Face and fingerprint access are unavailable in Illinois and Texas and limited to the U.S. and Canada.
- Capacity is up to 16 PINs, fewer than the Kwikset Halo’s 250 codes.
- The one-year limited warranty is a short coverage period for a combined camera and lock device.
Best for: Rental owners who want a combined lock and camera for monitoring arrivals, communicating with visitors, and managing a modest number of PINs.
Not ideal for: Hosts in Illinois or Texas who want face or fingerprint entry, or owners who only need a basic code lock with no camera functions.
- Model:MYQ-NE0BXAB1
- Access methods:Face recognition, fingerprint, PIN, app, key
- PIN capacity:Up to 16 PINs
- Camera:2K HDR with wide-angle lens and color night vision
- Camera and door features:Live view, motion alerts, two-way audio
- Connectivity:myQ app
- Included power:Rechargeable battery and charging cable
- Warranty:1-year limited
Our verdict“Pick the myQ Secure View if doorway video and visitor communication are as important as keyless rental entry.”
Yamiry YR01 Smart Fingerprint Door Lock with Keypad
The Yamiry YR01 suits landlords who want several ways to admit guests without relying on a phone alone. Fingerprint, passcode, fob, app, and mechanical-key entry give tenants options, while temporary codes and unlock history help an owner manage changing stays. Compared with the Kwikset HomeConnect 620, it offers biometric and fob access without requiring a compatible Z-Wave hub for basic entry; the Kwikset is the stronger fit for a hub-based setup with a much larger code capacity. Remote control and Alexa unlock on the Yamiry require a separately sold Wi-Fi gateway, so its app-based convenience has an extra hardware dependency. DIY installation and a reversible handle help with common door setups, but buyers should confirm their door matches its standard American wooden-door fit.
Pros:- Provides fingerprint, passcode, app, fob, and mechanical-key entry options.
- App supports temporary access codes and unlock history.
- Reversible handle accommodates left- and right-handed doors.
- Designed for screwdriver-based DIY installation.
Cons:- Remote control and Alexa unlock require a separately sold Wi-Fi gateway.
- Compatibility is described for standard American wooden doors, which may not suit every rental entrance.
Best for: Small rental owners who want fingerprint, fob, and temporary-code access in one lock and can manage access locally or add the gateway.
Not ideal for: Hosts who need remote control out of the box or whose doors fall outside the stated standard American wooden-door compatibility.
- Model:YR01
- Unlock methods:Fingerprint, Bluetooth app, passcode, key fob, mechanical key, Alexa with separately sold Wi-Fi gateway
- Included key fobs:2
- Included mechanical keys:2
- Installation:DIY; screwdriver installation
- Door compatibility:Designed for standard American wooden doors
- Handle:Reversible for left- or right-handed doors
Our verdict“Choose the Yamiry if varied guest-entry methods matter more than built-in remote access or a high-capacity code system.”
Kwikset HomeConnect 620 Z-Wave Keypad Smart Lock, Polished Brass
For a rental with frequent guest changes, the Kwikset HomeConnect 620 stands out for its capacity of up to 250 user codes. That makes it better suited than the Yamiry YR01 for owners who manage a large roster of individual access codes, while its scheduled auto-lock can reduce the chance of a door being left unsecured after checkout. It also offers S2 encryption, Grade 2 BHMA certification, and SmartKey re-keying, which gives owners a mechanical-key option when access arrangements change. The tradeoff is its dependence on a compatible Z-Wave hub, sold separately; unlike the Philips 4200 Series, it does not connect directly to Wi-Fi. It fits a hub-based rental setup well, but buyers seeking a simple standalone keypad lock should look elsewhere.
Pros:- Stores up to 250 customizable user codes.
- Scheduled auto-lock offers several delay settings.
- SmartKey re-keying and Grade 2 BHMA certification support rental security needs.
- Includes four AA batteries and installs with a screwdriver.
Cons:- Requires a compatible Z-Wave hub, sold separately.
- Four AA batteries require periodic replacement.
Best for: Property managers with many guests or staff who already use a compatible Z-Wave hub, including Ring Alarm.
Not ideal for: Owners seeking remote access without a hub, or those whose doors are outside the listed thickness and backset ranges.
- Model:HomeConnect 620 Traditional, 98695-003
- Connectivity:Z-Wave 700 Long Range; compatible hub required
- Security:S2 encryption; Grade 2 BHMA certified
- User-code capacity:Up to 250
- Auto-lock settings:30 seconds, 1, 3, 5, or 10 minutes
- Battery:4 included AA alkaline batteries; stated battery life at least 12 months
- Door fit:1-3/8 to 2 inches thick; adjustable 2-3/8 to 2-3/4 inch backset
- Finish:Polished brass
Our verdict“Pick the HomeConnect 620 for a hub-equipped rental portfolio that needs many user codes and scheduled locking.”
Veise VE017 Fingerprint Smart Door Lock with App Control, Matte Black
The Veise VE017 is a practical fit for owners who want to review access activity and manage users through an app, with several fallback entry methods for tenants. Its activity logs and remote user management make it more informative than the Yamiry YR01 as described, while local AES-128 encryption and temporary lockouts add security features without changing the everyday keypad-and-fingerprint experience. The Philips 4200 Series is a closer choice for landlords who want direct Wi-Fi remote control; the Veise requires its separately sold G1 Gateway for remote access and voice-assistant features. Its IP55 rating and USB-C emergency power are useful details for exposed entrances, but the four AA batteries are not included. This is a better match for app-focused owners comfortable adding a gateway than for anyone wanting a complete remote setup in the box.
Pros:- KK Home App supports remote user management and activity logs.
- Offers fingerprint, app, PIN, fob-card, shared-code, and mechanical-key access.
- On-device AES-128 encryption, intrusion alerts, and temporary lockouts are specified.
- IP55 metal design includes a USB-C emergency-power port.
Cons:- Remote access and voice-assistant control require a separately sold G1 Gateway.
- Four AA batteries are not included, and battery life varies with use.
Best for: Rental owners who value access logs, remote user management, and multiple backup entry methods, and are willing to add the G1 Gateway.
Not ideal for: Landlords who need remote access immediately without extra hardware or want batteries included.
- Model:VE017
- Unlock methods:Fingerprint, app, authorized access, fob card, PIN, shared code, mechanical key; voice assistant with G1 Gateway
- Auto-lock timer:0–180 seconds
- Battery:4 AA/LR6 alkaline batteries, not included; stated life about 12 months
- Security:On-device AES-128 encryption, intrusion alerts, and temporary lockouts
- Weather resistance:IP55
- Emergency power:USB-C port
- Smart-home compatibility:Alexa and Google voice assistants with separately sold G1 Gateway
Our verdict“Choose the Veise if entry records and app-managed permissions are priorities and you are prepared to buy its gateway separately.”
Philips 4200 Series WiFi Keypad Deadbolt with Handle
The Philips 4200 Series is the straightforward pick for a landlord who wants to manage a rental remotely without purchasing a separate hub. Its direct 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi connection supports app control, access history, and Alexa or Google Assistant, giving it a simpler remote-access path than the gateway-dependent Yamiry YR01 and Veise VE017. Fingerprint entry and multiple PIN options suit different tenant preferences, while the included matching levers make this a complete deadbolt-and-handle set. There are compromises: its stated battery life is up to six months, shorter than the approximately 12-month figures listed for the Veise and Kwikset, and batteries are not included. Auto-lock is also off by default, so owners need to configure it. Check router distance and door measurements before choosing it.
Pros:- Connects to 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi without a separate hub.
- Supports remote app control, access history, Alexa, and Google Assistant.
- Fingerprint and multiple PIN types give guests alternative entry methods.
- Includes two door levers, latch assembly, and mounting hardware.
Cons:- Batteries are not included, and stated battery life is up to six months.
- Auto-lock is off by default, and Wi-Fi works best within 33 feet of the router.
Best for: Individual rental owners who want direct app-based remote access and a coordinated deadbolt-and-handle replacement without buying a hub.
Not ideal for: Landlords seeking longer stated battery life, included batteries, or installation on doors outside the specified thickness range.
- Model:DDL242X-1HW-L
- Connectivity:2.4 GHz Wi-Fi; no hub required
- Access methods:Fingerprint, PIN code, app, Alexa, and Google Assistant
- Auto-lock delay:0–180 seconds; off by default
- Stated battery life:Up to 6 months
- Batteries:Standard 1.5V alkaline batteries, not included
- Door thickness:1-3/8 to 1-3/4 inches (38–50 mm)
- Included hardware:Deadbolt, two door levers, latch assembly, and mounting hardware
Our verdict“Choose the Philips 4200 Series if hub-free remote management matters more than longer battery life.”
myQ Secure View 3-in-1 Smart Lock with 2K HDR Camera
The myQ Secure View 3-in-1 is the most security-camera-focused option here: it combines a smart deadbolt with a doorbell-style camera, 2K HDR video, color night vision, and two-way audio. That gives a host a way to see and speak with someone at the entrance as well as manage access through the app, a more elaborate setup than the Philips 4200 Series, which focuses on a Wi-Fi deadbolt and included handle. Face recognition, fingerprint, PIN, app, and key entry give guests several routes inside, but capacity is limited to 16 PINs—far below the Kwikset HomeConnect 620’s 250. Battery life is stated at four to six months, and some detection features require a subscription. Owners should also check regional Face Access availability and account for separately sold accessories.
Pros:- Combines a smart deadbolt, video doorbell, and security camera.
- Provides 2K HDR video, color night vision, and two-way audio.
- Offers face, fingerprint, PIN, app, and key access.
- Rechargeable battery has a stated four-to-six-month life.
Cons:- Some detection features require a subscription.
- Battery life is four to six months; a spare battery and myQ Chime are sold separately.
- Face Access is unavailable in Illinois and Texas.
Best for: Hosts who want entry control and a camera with two-way communication in one device, and who are comfortable managing subscriptions and battery recharging.
Not ideal for: Landlords who need many individual PINs, long battery intervals, or face access in Illinois or Texas.
- Access methods:Face recognition, fingerprint, PIN, app, and key
- Camera:2K HDR
- Audio:Two-way audio
- Night vision:Color
- PIN capacity:Up to 16 PINs
- Battery life:4–6 months
- Connectivity:myQ
- Dimensions and weight:2.95 x 3.84 x 6.85 inches; 4.9 pounds
Our verdict“Pick the myQ Secure View if seeing and speaking with visitors is worth trading PIN capacity and longer battery intervals for a camera-equipped lock.”
Lockin Veno Solar Fingerprint Smart Lock with Handle
For a rental where frequent code changes and routine battery attention are pain points, I’d put the Lockin Veno near the top of the shortlist. Its built-in solar panel can help replenish the 37Wh battery when the exterior gets enough light, while fingerprint, PIN, app, voice, and key entry give guests several ways in. Temporary passcodes, entry alerts, and access logs without subscription fees also suit owners who manage turnovers remotely. Compared with the Tapo DL100, the Veno adds fingerprint access and solar charging, but Tapo offers a stated capacity of 200 access codes and familiar AA batteries. The Veno’s solar benefit depends on its light exposure, and its BHMA Grade 3 rating is a more modest security classification than the Kwikset Halo Select’s Grade AAA.
Pros:- Solar panel and 37Wh battery may reduce routine charging when the exterior receives sufficient light
- Five access methods include fingerprint, PIN, app, voice control, and mechanical key
- Built-in Wi-Fi and Matter support remote access and smart home integration
- Temporary passcodes, entry alerts, and access logs are included without subscription fees
Cons:- Solar charging depends on adequate light at the door
- USB-C backup charging may be needed if the battery runs low
- BHMA Grade 3 certification is below the Kwikset Halo Select’s stated Grade AAA
Best for: Rental owners who want fingerprint entry, remote guest codes, and less frequent battery upkeep on a door with good daylight exposure
Not ideal for: Hosts whose lock sits in a shaded entry or who prioritize a higher stated security grade over solar-assisted power and multiple entry methods
- Power:Built-in perovskite solar panel and 37Wh battery
- Backup charging:USB-C
- Unlock methods:Fingerprint, PIN code, smartphone app, voice control, mechanical key
- Fingerprint recognition success rate:≥97%
- Unlock time:≤1.5 seconds
- Connectivity:Built-in Wi-Fi and Matter
- Security certification:BHMA Grade 3
- Weather protection:IP53
- Subscription fees:None
Our verdict“Choose the Veno for a bright rental entry where flexible guest access and solar-assisted power matter more than a higher security-grade designation.”
ULTRALOQ Bolt SE Wi-Fi Smart Deadbolt with Matter over Thread
The ULTRALOQ Bolt SE is a strong fit for hosts juggling cleaners, co-hosts, and guests: it supports up to 50 fingerprints and 50 passcodes, plus web-portal control and shared eKeys. That gives an owner more ways to grant access than the Philips Wi-Fi Smart Deadbolt, which lists up to 100 passcodes but no fingerprint-capacity figure or web portal. The Bolt SE also has an IP65 weather rating and up to 18 months of stated battery life, useful for exposed entries and fewer service visits. Its main catch is setup complexity: Matter over Thread needs a compatible hub, even though 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi is built in. The door sensor is not included, so it cannot independently report whether the door is physically shut.
Pros:- Supports up to 50 fingerprints and 50 passcodes for multiple guests and service providers
- Web portal, eKeys, remote control, activity history, and real-time notifications support remote hosting
- IP65 weather resistance is higher than the Lockin Veno’s IP53 rating
- Battery life is specified as up to 18 months, with DIY installation listed at about 10 minutes
Cons:- Matter over Thread requires a compatible hub or Thread Border Router
- Wi-Fi support is limited to 2.4 GHz
- Door sensor is not included
Best for: Rental operators who share access among guests and staff, want fingerprint and code capacity, and have an exposed exterior door
Not ideal for: Owners seeking Matter over Thread without buying or already owning a compatible hub, or those who need a door sensor in the box
- Access methods:Fingerprint, passcodes, smartphone app, web portal, shared eKey/code, voice control, 2 mechanical keys
- Fingerprint capacity:Up to 50
- Passcode capacity:Up to 50
- Connectivity:2.4 GHz Wi-Fi; Matter over Thread
- Matter hub requirement:Compatible Matter over Thread hub (Thread Border Router)
- Battery life:Up to 18 months
- Material:Zinc alloy
- Weather resistance:IP65
- Warranty:Lifetime mechanical; 18-month electronic
Our verdict“Pick the Bolt SE if your rental needs several kinds of shared access and weather protection, and you can accommodate its optional Thread hub requirement.”
Tapo DL100 Smart Wi-Fi Deadbolt Door Lock with Keyless Tactile Keypad
When a rental has a steady stream of guests and service workers, the Tapo DL100’s 200 access-code capacity is its clearest advantage: an owner can issue distinct codes rather than reuse a small pool. It also supports keypad, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi app, and voice access, with activity alerts and customizable auto-lock. Compared with the Philips Wi-Fi Smart Deadbolt, Tapo doubles the listed passcode capacity and includes four AA batteries, but its stated battery life is up to 200 days in Wi-Fi mode or 300 days in Bluetooth mode, so owners should plan for periodic replacement. The USB-C emergency power port and two keys provide fallback options. For a rental manager who values code volume over fingerprint entry, this is a more practical fit than the Lockin Veno.
Pros:- Capacity for up to 200 access codes suits frequent guest and staff turnover
- Keypad, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi app, voice control, and two backup keys provide varied entry options
- Four AA batteries are included, and USB-C offers emergency power
- Works with Alexa, Google Home, and Samsung SmartThings
Cons:- Battery life is limited to up to 200 days in Wi-Fi mode or 300 days in Bluetooth mode
- Does not list fingerprint entry, unlike the Lockin Veno and ULTRALOQ Bolt SE
- Requires ongoing AA battery replacement
Best for: Hosts and small property managers who need many distinct guest, cleaner, and maintenance codes on one door
Not ideal for: Owners who want fingerprint unlocking or a long interval between battery changes, especially when the lock will stay connected over Wi-Fi
- Model:DL100
- Unlock methods:Keypad, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi app, voice control with PIN verification, 2 backup keys
- Maximum access codes:200
- Battery type:4 AA/LR6 batteries
- Battery life:Up to 200 days in Wi-Fi mode or 300 days in Bluetooth mode
- Emergency power:USB-C port
- Smart home compatibility:Alexa, Google Home, Samsung SmartThings
- Security certification:BHMA Grade 3
Our verdict“Choose the DL100 if managing a large roster of separate access codes matters more than fingerprint entry or extended battery life.”
Philips Wi-Fi Smart Deadbolt Lock with Fingerprint and Keyless Entry
The Philips Wi-Fi Smart Deadbolt is a sensible middle ground for a rental owner who wants remote control and fingerprint entry without adding a hub. Built-in 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi handles remote locking and unlocking, while up to 100 passcodes, including scheduled or one-time codes, give hosts a way to separate guest access from recurring service access. Compared with the Tapo DL100, Philips adds fingerprint access and Away Mode, but Tapo supports twice as many codes and includes batteries. Philips requires AA alkaline batteries that are not included, and neither model includes a door sensor. Its auto-lock delay can be set from 10 to 180 seconds, which helps reduce the chance of a door being left unsecured, though it does not confirm the door has actually closed.
Pros:- Fingerprint, app, passcode, physical key, and voice-control access cover common guest needs
- Built-in Wi-Fi enables remote locking and unlocking without an additional hub
- Supports up to 100 custom passcodes, including scheduled or one-time codes
- Auto-lock, Away Mode, access alerts, and history help with remote oversight
Cons:- AA alkaline batteries are not included
- Supports only 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi
- Door sensor is not included
Best for: Rental owners who want fingerprint entry, remote access, and scheduled or one-time codes without a separate hub
Not ideal for: Hosts who need more than 100 codes, expect a door sensor in the package, or want batteries included for installation
- Model:DDL242X-1HW
- Unlock methods:App, passcode, fingerprint, physical key, Alexa, Google Assistant
- Wi-Fi:Built-in 2.4 GHz
- Maximum passcodes:100
- Auto-lock delay:10–180 seconds
- Compatible door thickness:1-3/8 to 2 inches (38–50 mm)
- Battery type:AA alkaline (LR6); not included
- Door sensor:Not included
Our verdict“Pick Philips for hub-free remote management and fingerprint access, but choose Tapo instead if code capacity and included batteries matter more.”
Kwikset Halo Select Wi-Fi and Matter Smart Deadbolt, Satin Nickel
Among these five, the Kwikset Halo Select makes the strongest case for owners who rank certification and large-scale code management first. Its BHMA Grade AAA certification exceeds the Grade 3 ratings listed for the Lockin Veno and Tapo DL100, and it supports up to 250 temporary, scheduled, or permanent guest codes. Wi-Fi enables remote control without a hub; Matter connectivity through Thread is available for owners with a compatible smart-home setup. Compared with the ULTRALOQ Bolt SE, Halo Select offers substantially more guest codes and a higher stated grade, while ULTRALOQ adds fingerprint entry and gives a battery-life estimate. Halo Select’s listed access methods center on app, touchscreen codes, and geofencing rather than fingerprint, and its electronics warranty is one year.
Pros:- BHMA Grade AAA certification is the highest listed among these five locks
- Up to 250 temporary, scheduled, or permanent guest codes support frequent turnover
- Wi-Fi provides remote locking and unlocking without a hub
- Supports Alexa, Apple Home, and Google Home, with intrusion alerts
Cons:- Listed access methods do not include fingerprint entry
- Matter connectivity via Thread requires compatible equipment and is optional rather than necessary for setup
- Electronics warranty is limited to one year
Best for: Rental owners managing many guests or recurring workers who prioritize a high stated security grade, remote access, and flexible code scheduling
Not ideal for: Hosts who require fingerprint entry, a longer electronics warranty, or Matter over Thread without compatible Thread equipment
- Model:Halo Select (998000-003)
- Connectivity:Wi-Fi; Matter via Thread
- Smart home compatibility:Amazon Alexa, Apple Home, Google Home
- Access methods:App, touchscreen codes, geofencing
- Guest access codes:Up to 250
- Security certification:BHMA Grade AAA
- Finish:Satin Nickel
- Warranty:Limited lifetime mechanical and finish; 1-year electronics
Our verdict“Choose the Halo Select if your rental needs a large, flexible guest-code roster and a higher stated security grade, rather than fingerprint access.”
How We Picked
I ranked these locks for the realities of rental use: how easily an owner can grant and revoke access, whether the lock offers remote control or relies on a keypad, and how much extra equipment the setup may need. I also weighed usability for guests and tenants, power and maintenance demands, product format, and whether the listed connectivity is likely to fit a typical rental setup. A fingerprint reader or camera can add convenience, but I did not treat more features as an automatic advantage.
The order favors options that appear to balance access flexibility with manageable setup and upkeep. Connected locks with remote access and flexible entry methods rank ahead of basic keypad models for owners handling off-site access; straightforward, less-connected models remain useful when simplicity matters more. Hub-dependent, camera-equipped, solar-powered, and Matter-oriented picks serve narrower needs, so their position depends on whether those extras solve a real property-management problem. Because door dimensions, network coverage, and included access features can vary by model and installation, I would verify the product specifications before purchase.
Factors to Consider When Choosing Smart Lock For Rental Property
I’d choose a rental lock by mapping it to the way access changes at the property, not by counting features. These broader checks can help prevent a lock that looks capable on paper from becoming a source of tenant confusion or extra maintenance.
Match Access Control to Your Turnover Routine
Start by listing who needs access, how often that changes, and who will make those changes. A single long-term tenant may need a dependable keypad and a clear way to handle a lost or shared code, while a short-stay property calls for a smoother process for issuing and removing temporary access. Do not assume that a fingerprint reader solves guest turnover: visitors may not want to enroll, and an owner still needs a way to remove biometric access later. Check whether the lock supports distinct user codes and whether changing one code affects other occupants. For multi-unit management, map the setup process across every door before buying several locks. A slightly simpler lock may be easier to run consistently than a feature-rich model with a different workflow for each property.
Decide Whether Remote Access Is Worth the Setup
Remote locking, alerts, and code changes can save a trip when you manage a property from elsewhere, but they depend on a working connection and compatible setup. Confirm whether the lock connects directly to Wi-Fi or needs a separate hub; a hub-based system can add equipment, placement, and troubleshooting steps. Check Wi-Fi strength at the actual door, not just inside the living area, since an exterior entrance may receive a weaker signal. If connectivity drops, know how tenants can still enter and what access tasks will have to wait until service returns. Owners who live nearby and rarely change codes remotely may prefer a keypad model that asks less of their network. Treat remote access as an operational convenience, not a replacement for a backup entry plan.
Check Door Fit Before Comparing Smart Features
Smart locks are not interchangeable just because they are described as deadbolts. Measure door thickness, backset, bore hole, and existing hardware, then compare those measurements with the manufacturer’s requirements. A lock with a handle may require a different setup from a deadbolt-only model, and replacing a full handle set can create extra work or leave mismatched finishes. Check whether the rental door, frame, and strike plate are in sound condition; a motorized bolt cannot fix a misaligned door. If you rent the property rather than own it, get approval before drilling or changing exterior hardware. Verifying fit first can prevent a return, a rushed installation, or a tenant-facing delay.
Plan for Batteries, Connectivity, and Maintenance
Every connected lock adds a maintenance task, even if that task is only checking battery status and updating access records. Ask who will receive low-power alerts, who will replace batteries, and where the backup key or emergency procedure will be kept. Rechargeable or solar-assisted designs may reduce some battery handling, but their value depends on charging access, exposure, and the manufacturer’s instructions. A camera adds another device to keep connected and raises questions about placement, recordings, and tenant privacy. Put a simple maintenance schedule and handoff process in writing, especially if a manager or cleaner handles the property. The less reliable your maintenance routine, the more appealing a straightforward lock with a clear backup method may be.
Keep Tenant Privacy and Local Rules in the Decision
Entry records, cameras, and app notifications can affect tenant privacy, so decide what information you actually need before choosing connected features. A lock that records access events may help resolve a key handoff question, but tenants should know what is recorded, who can see it, and how long it is retained. Camera-equipped products call for extra care around the field of view and any audio or recording functions. Check local rental rules and lease terms before adding monitoring or changing access procedures; requirements vary by location. Avoid using smart-lock logs as a substitute for clear notice, consent where required, or lawful entry practices. Choosing fewer data-generating features can be the better fit when access control is the only goal.
Spend for the Problem You Need to Solve
Paying for Wi-Fi, a hub connection, a camera, fingerprint access, or a smart-home standard only makes sense when that feature fits your management routine. Remote owners may value app access more than a renter who lives nearby and can use a code. A camera can be useful for a specific entry-management need, but it brings privacy and network duties that a keypad alone does not. Matter or Z-Wave compatibility matters most when your existing home or property-management setup can use it; a compatibility label by itself does not guarantee an easier rental workflow. Compare the cost of installation, accessories, battery upkeep, and staff time alongside the hardware. I would prioritize dependable access and a workable backup plan before paying for features that will rarely be used.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is a Wi-Fi smart lock a better choice than a keypad lock for a rental?
It depends on how often you manage access from off-site. Wi-Fi can let an owner handle codes or check lock status remotely, which is useful when a tenant arrives outside normal hours or a cleaner needs access. A keypad-only lock can be simpler when someone local manages the property and remote changes are rare. Compare the connection method and check whether a hub is required, since that affects installation and troubleshooting. Either way, plan for what happens if the network or app is unavailable.
Can I give each tenant or guest a separate entry code?
Some smart locks support multiple user codes, but the number of codes, scheduling controls, and remote-management functions differ by model. Confirm that the lock lets you remove one person’s access without changing the code for every remaining occupant. For short stays, timed codes can simplify handoffs, but only if the lock and app support the schedule you need. If codes must be changed manually, write down who is responsible and when the change happens. Do not assume fingerprint access can replace separate guest codes; enrollment and removal may be less practical for frequent turnover.
What should I do if the smart lock loses power or the internet goes down?
Before installation, check the manufacturer’s stated backup entry methods, which may include a physical key, an exterior power connection, or keypad operation that does not depend on the internet. The exact fallback varies, so verify it for the specific model rather than relying on a general assumption about smart locks. A network outage may block remote changes while leaving local keypad entry available, but confirm that behavior in the product documentation. Keep the backup instructions accessible to the property manager and explain them to tenants. A spare key or documented emergency procedure can prevent a connectivity problem from becoming a lockout.
Are fingerprint locks practical for short-term rentals?
Fingerprint entry can be convenient for a regular user, but it may add friction for short-term guests who do not want to enroll biometric data or need access only briefly. Ask how biometric profiles are stored, how they are deleted, and whether guests can use another entry method instead. A temporary keypad code is often easier to explain and revoke at checkout. Fingerprint access may fit a property with recurring occupants or staff who visit regularly, provided enrollment and removal are straightforward. For frequent guest turnover, choose a lock based on its code-management workflow rather than the presence of a fingerprint reader alone.
Should I choose a lock with a camera for a rental property?
A camera is only a good fit if it solves a specific entry-management need that a lock alone cannot. It also adds network, power, data-storage, and privacy questions, so check where it points and what it records before installation. Rental rules and privacy expectations vary, and exterior cameras may still capture shared areas or neighboring spaces. Tell tenants what the device does and follow applicable local requirements and lease terms. If you mainly need to control entry, a keypad or app-connected lock without a camera may be easier to manage.
Conclusion
For the best overall balance of connected access and fingerprint entry, I’d choose the eufy Security Smart Lock C220, after checking fit and confirming its access workflow suits the property. The TEEHO TE001 is my best-value-style pick for owners who want a simpler keypad approach without prioritizing remote management, while the myQ Secure View 3-in-1 models are better suited to a premium, camera-focused setup when their added features justify the extra privacy and upkeep duties. For beginners, I’d lean toward the most straightforward keypad option that matches the door and has a clear backup-entry method, rather than starting with hub-dependent or camera-equipped hardware. Owners who need a Z-Wave setup can look at the Kwikset HomeConnect 620; those focused on Matter compatibility can compare the ULTRALOQ Bolt SE and Kwikset Halo Select. Whichever you choose, verify door measurements, connectivity, code controls, and tenant privacy before installing it.
