The best smart locks with digital keys combine convenient phone or keypad access with a physical key or other backup. My best overall pick is the Schlage Encode WiFi Smart Deadbolt for buyers who want built-in Wi-Fi from a familiar lock brand; the Yale Assure Lock 2 stands out for a keypad-first setup, while the Philips Wi-Fi Smart Deadbolt with Fingerprint adds biometric entry. The main tradeoff is between access options and simplicity: more ways to unlock can mean more setup, maintenance, and compatibility checks. Door fit and whether remote access needs a hub or built-in Wi-Fi matter just as much as the app. Read on for the full breakdown of all 15 picks and how to match one to your entryway.
Get the latest gadgets delivered free with Prime
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
- Member-only deals all year
Complete the kit
Key Takeaways
- Schlage Encode earns the overall lead for combining a recognized deadbolt format with built-in Wi-Fi, so buyers can focus on remote access without selecting a separate hub.
- Yale Assure Lock 2 is a strong keypad-first alternative for households that want smart control without making fingerprint recognition their main entry method.
- Philips models offer several distinct bundles: some pair a lock with a handle or lever, while others add a fingerprint reader, making exact model names and included hardware important.
- Yamiry and Veise broaden the biometric and handle choices, but shoppers should check app connectivity, door compatibility, and backup access details before choosing a feature-rich model.
- TEEHO and the Yale keypad deadbolt suit simpler access needs; they may be a better fit than connected locks when local keypad entry matters more than phone-based remote control.
| Philips Wi-Fi Smart Front Door Lock Set with Handle |  | Best Overall for Built-In Remote Access | Unlock methods: App, Alexa or Google Assistant voice commands, keypad password, physical key | Connectivity: Built-in 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi; no hub required | Password capacity: Up to 100 permanent, one-time, or time-based passwords | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Yale Code Keypad Deadbolt, Keyless Entry, Black Suede |  | Best for Simple, Hub-Free Keypad Access | Entry codes: Up to 20 | Keypad: Backlit | Connectivity: No app, Wi-Fi, or hub required | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Philips Wi-Fi Smart Deadbolt Lock with Fingerprint and Keyless Entry |  | Best for Fingerprint Access and Remote Management | Unlock methods: App, passcode, fingerprint, physical key, Alexa or Google Assistant voice control | Connectivity: Built-in 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi; no hub required | Recommended router distance: Within 65 feet | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Yamiry YR01 Smart Fingerprint Door Lock with Keypad |  | Best for Flexible DIY Entry Options | Unlock methods: Fingerprint, Bluetooth app, passcode, key fob, mechanical key, Alexa with separately sold Wi-Fi gateway | Access management: Permanent and temporary access, one-time passcodes, unlock records | Connectivity: Bluetooth; remote control requires a separately sold Wi-Fi gateway | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Sifely S Fingerprint Smart Lock with Reversible Handle |  | Best for Local Bluetooth Access and Emergency Power | Unlock methods: Fingerprint, PIN code, Bluetooth app, compatible RFID key fob, mechanical key | Connectivity: Bluetooth; remote internet control requires a compatible Wi-Fi Gateway sold separately | Material: Zinc alloy | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| TEEHO TE001 Keyless Entry Keypad Deadbolt, Matte Black |  | Best for Simple Guest Codes | Model: TE001 | Access codes: Up to 20 user codes plus a one-time guest code | Auto-lock delay: 10–99 seconds; off by default | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Yamiry YR05 Fingerprint Smart Door Knob Lock |  | Best for Multiple Local Unlock Methods | Model: YR05 | Unlock methods: App, password, key fob, fingerprint, physical key | Connectivity: Bluetooth | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Veise VE027 Wi-Fi Smart Lock with Fingerprint Keyless Entry, Matte Black |  | Best for Hub-Free Access Variety | Model: VE027 | Connectivity: 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi and Bluetooth | Access methods: App, fingerprint, PIN, voice assistant, authorized administrator, IC card, physical key | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Schlage Encode WiFi Smart Deadbolt with Century Trim, Matte Black |  | Best for Remote Code Management | Model: BE489WBCEN622 | Connectivity: Built-in Wi-Fi | Access codes: Up to 100 | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Yamiry YR04 Keypad Smart Door Knob Lock |  | Best for Basic Keypad Door-Knob Replacement | Model: YR04 | Lock type: Keypad door knob | User codes: Up to 20, plus one-time guest codes | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Veise VE06-L Smart Deadbolt Lock with Two Lever Handles, Matte Black |  | Best for Flexible Shared Access | Model: VE06-L | Entry methods: App, codes, web portal, IC cards, e-key, physical key, Apple Watch | Access capacity: 250+ codes; 1,000+ IC cards | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Veise VE017 Fingerprint Smart Door Lock with App Control, Matte Black |  | Best for Fingerprint-First Entry | Model: VE017 | Entry methods: Fingerprint, app, fob card, code, code sharing, voice assistant with G1 gateway, mechanical key | Fingerprint recognition: Self-learning AI; under 0.2 seconds | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Philips Wi-Fi Smart Keypad Deadbolt with Fingerprint Reader and Lever Handle |  | Best Hub-Free Fingerprint Pick | Model: DDL241X-1HW-L-M | Entry methods: Fingerprint, PIN code, app, voice control, physical key | Fingerprint capacity: Up to 50 fingerprints | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Yale Assure Lock 2 Wi-Fi Smart Deadbolt with Keypad |  | Best for Scheduled Digital Keys | Model: YRD410-WF1-619 | Entry methods: Keypad, smartphone app, Apple Watch, backup key | Access codes: Unlimited; shareable, schedulable, and revocable | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Philips 4200 Series WiFi Keypad Deadbolt with Handle |  | Best for Flexible PIN Types | Model: 4200 Series DDL242X-1HW-L | Connectivity: 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi; no hub required | Access methods: App, PIN codes, fingerprint, voice assistant | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| smart locks with digital key | Connectivity | Model |
|---|---|---|
| Philips Wi-Fi Smart Front Door | Built-in 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi; no hub required | — |
| Yale Code Keypad Deadbolt | No app, Wi-Fi, or hub required | — |
| Philips Wi-Fi Smart Deadbolt L | Built-in 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi; no hub required | — |
| Yamiry YR01 Smart Fingerprint | Bluetooth; remote control requires a separately sold Wi-Fi gateway | — |
| Sifely S Fingerprint Smart Loc | Bluetooth; remote internet control requires a compatible Wi-Fi Gateway sold separately | — |
| TEEHO TE001 Keyless Entry Keyp | — | TE001 |
| Yamiry YR05 Fingerprint Smart | Bluetooth | YR05 |
| Veise VE027 Wi-Fi Smart Lock w | 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi and Bluetooth | VE027 |
| Schlage Encode WiFi Smart Dead | Built-in Wi-Fi | BE489WBCEN622 |
| Yamiry YR04 Keypad Smart Door | — | YR04 |
| Veise VE06-L Smart Deadbolt Lo | — | VE06-L |
| Veise VE017 Fingerprint Smart | — | VE017 |
| Philips Wi-Fi Smart Keypad Dea | 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi and Bluetooth | DDL241X-1HW-L-M |
| Yale Assure Lock 2 Wi-Fi Smart | 2.4 or 5 GHz Wi-Fi; no hub or bridge required | YRD410-WF1-619 |
| Philips 4200 Series WiFi Keypa | 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi; no hub required | 4200 Series DDL242X-1HW-L |
More Details on Our Top Picks
Philips Wi-Fi Smart Front Door Lock Set with Handle
I’d put this Philips first for buyers who want digital access plus a complete handle-and-deadbolt set. Its built-in 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi allows remote locking and unlocking without a separate hub, while the keypad supports up to 100 permanent, one-time, or scheduled passwords. App and voice control add convenience, and the physical key provides a fallback if the electronics are unavailable. Compared with the Yale Code Keypad Deadbolt, this model offers remote access and a much larger stated password capacity, but the Yale avoids Wi-Fi setup and keeps things simpler. The tradeoff here is a greater setup and upkeep burden: it takes eight AA batteries, sold separately, and only supports 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi. Check your door dimensions before choosing this handle set.
Pros:- Built-in Wi-Fi enables remote control without a separate hub
- Supports up to 100 permanent, one-time, or time-based passwords
- Offers app, voice assistant, keypad, and physical-key access
- Includes a handle and adjustable auto-lock timing
Cons:- Requires eight AA alkaline batteries, which are not included
- Wi-Fi is limited to 2.4 GHz networks
- Door thickness and cross-bore dimensions must match the listed fit
Best for: Households that want remote access, multiple types of temporary codes, and a matching handle-and-deadbolt set without adding a hub
Not ideal for: Buyers with only 5 GHz Wi-Fi, a door outside the listed dimensions, or a preference for a simpler keypad-only lock
- Unlock methods:App, Alexa or Google Assistant voice commands, keypad password, physical key
- Connectivity:Built-in 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi; no hub required
- Password capacity:Up to 100 permanent, one-time, or time-based passwords
- Auto-lock delay:10–180 seconds
- Door thickness:1-3/8 to 2 inches (35–50 mm)
- Cross bore:1-1/2 or 2-1/8 inches (38 or 54 mm)
- Batteries:Eight AA (LR6) alkaline batteries; not included
- Included components:Smart lock and handle
Our verdict“Choose this Philips if you want a full handle set with hub-free remote access and flexible digital codes, and your door fits its measurements.”
Yale Code Keypad Deadbolt, Keyless Entry, Black Suede
The Yale is the straightforward pick for buyers who want digital entry codes without an app, network, or hub. Its backlit keypad stores up to 20 codes, and auto-lock can reduce the chance of leaving the door unsecured. A backup key gives you another way in. Compared with the Philips Wi-Fi Smart Front Door Lock Set, the Yale gives up remote control, voice access, and the larger code capacity, but it also avoids Wi-Fi configuration and dependence on a connected service. That makes it a better fit for a rental unit, secondary entrance, or household that wants a keypad first and foremost. It is less suitable if you need to issue many temporary credentials or manage access while away. Door thickness, backset, and bore dimensions also need to match its specified fit.
Pros:- Operates without an app, Wi-Fi, or hub
- Stores up to 20 entry codes
- Backlit keypad supports entry in low light
- Includes auto-lock and a backup key
Cons:- Does not provide app or remote access
- Offers fewer entry codes than the Philips Wi-Fi models in this roundup
- Fit is limited to specified door thickness, backset, and bore dimensions
Best for: Homeowners or landlords who want a dependable keypad deadbolt with several household codes and no smart-home setup
Not ideal for: People who need remote unlocking, app-based access management, voice control, or more than 20 entry codes
- Entry codes:Up to 20
- Keypad:Backlit
- Connectivity:No app, Wi-Fi, or hub required
- Auto-lock:Yes
- Backup key:Included
- Operating temperature:-22°F to 140°F
- Door thickness:1-3/8 to 1-3/4 inches
- Backset and bore:2-3/8 to 2-3/4-inch backset; 1-1/2 to 2-1/8-inch borehole
Our verdict“Pick the Yale if keypad codes and uncomplicated operation matter more to you than remote or app-based digital keys.”
Philips Wi-Fi Smart Deadbolt Lock with Fingerprint and Keyless Entry
This Philips is the strongest fit for households that want fingerprint entry alongside remote digital-key management. It combines fingerprint, passcode, app, physical-key, and voice access, with built-in Wi-Fi for remote locking, activity alerts, access history, and scheduled or one-time codes. That makes it more flexible than the Yale Code Keypad Deadbolt, which keeps access local and keypad-based. Compared with the Philips front-door set, this model adds fingerprint entry but does not include a handle, so the choice depends on whether biometric access or a matched hardware set matters more. It also requires a dependable 2.4 GHz connection, with the router recommended within 65 feet, and its batteries are not included. There’s no door sensor in the package, so it cannot independently report whether the door itself is open.
Pros:- Fingerprint access adds a fast alternative to entering a code
- Built-in Wi-Fi supports remote control, alerts, and access history
- Supports up to 100 custom passcodes, including one-time and scheduled codes
- Auto-lock and Away Mode provide additional security settings
Cons:- Requires 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi, with a recommended router distance of 65 feet or less
- AA alkaline batteries are not included
- Door sensor is not included
Best for: Busy households that want fingerprint entry, remote access management, and temporary or scheduled codes on a deadbolt
Not ideal for: Buyers who need a door sensor, have a weak or distant 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi signal, or want a handle included
- Unlock methods:App, passcode, fingerprint, physical key, Alexa or Google Assistant voice control
- Connectivity:Built-in 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi; no hub required
- Recommended router distance:Within 65 feet
- Passcode capacity:Up to 100 custom passcodes
- Auto-lock delay:10–180 seconds
- Door thickness:1-3/8 to 2 inches
- Battery type:AA alkaline (LR6); not included
- Door sensor:Not included
Our verdict“Choose this Philips over the keypad-only Yale if fingerprint entry and remote access records are priorities, and you can provide suitable Wi-Fi.”
Yamiry YR01 Smart Fingerprint Door Lock with Keypad
The Yamiry YR01 suits buyers who want several ways to enter and a reversible handle for different door orientations. Fingerprint, passcode, Bluetooth app, key fob, and mechanical-key access cover varied household needs; the app supports temporary and permanent access plus one-time codes and unlock records. Its stated DIY installation uses a screwdriver and requires no additional drilling, which may appeal to people replacing compatible hardware themselves. The important distinction from the Philips Wi-Fi Smart Deadbolt is connectivity: Philips has built-in Wi-Fi, while this Yamiry needs a separately sold gateway for remote control and Alexa. Without that accessory, app access is Bluetooth-based rather than a true remote digital key. The included fobs and mechanical keys add useful alternatives, but buyers should verify that their wooden door is compatible before ordering.
Pros:- Provides fingerprint, app, passcode, key fob, and mechanical-key entry
- App supports temporary and permanent access, one-time codes, and unlock records
- Reversible handle accommodates left- or right-handed doors
- Designed for screwdriver installation without additional drilling
Cons:- Remote control and Alexa require a separately sold Wi-Fi gateway
- Without the gateway, app control is Bluetooth-based
- Door compatibility is described for most standard American wooden doors
Best for: DIY-minded households with a compatible wooden door that want fingerprint, keypad, fob, and local app access
Not ideal for: People who need remote unlocking out of the box, built-in Wi-Fi, or confirmed compatibility with nonstandard door materials
- Unlock methods:Fingerprint, Bluetooth app, passcode, key fob, mechanical key, Alexa with separately sold Wi-Fi gateway
- Access management:Permanent and temporary access, one-time passcodes, unlock records
- Connectivity:Bluetooth; remote control requires a separately sold Wi-Fi gateway
- Installation:DIY; screwdriver required; no additional drilling
- Door compatibility:Most standard American wooden doors
- Handle:Reversible for left- or right-handed doors
- Included components:Exterior assembly, interior assembly, two key fobs, two mechanical keys, screw set, adjustable latch
Our verdict“Choose the Yamiry for varied local entry methods and a reversible handle, but choose a built-in-Wi-Fi Philips if remote access is a must.”
Sifely S Fingerprint Smart Lock with Reversible Handle
The Sifely S is a good match for buyers who want fingerprint and PIN entry with local Bluetooth management, rather than built-in internet access. It also accepts a compatible RFID fob or mechanical key, and supports customizable codes alongside auto-lock, Passage Mode, and Privacy Mode. Its micro-USB emergency power port gives a fallback when its four AA batteries run out, a useful distinction from the listed Philips and Yale options, which specify battery power but no comparable emergency port. That said, it is not the better choice for remote digital keys out of the box: internet control and supported voice features require a separately sold Wi-Fi Gateway. Compared with the Yamiry YR01, it offers a similar mix of local entry methods, while the gateway requirement remains a key limitation. Check the door bore and backset before buying.
Pros:- Offers fingerprint, PIN, Bluetooth app, compatible RFID fob, and mechanical-key entry
- Supports timed, one-time, recurring, and permanent passcodes
- Includes auto-lock, Passage Mode, and Privacy Mode
- Micro-USB port offers an emergency power option
Cons:- Remote internet control and supported voice features require a separately sold Wi-Fi Gateway
- Four AA batteries are required and not included
- Door bore and backset must match the listed dimensions
Best for: Households seeking fingerprint and PIN access with Bluetooth user management, a reversible lever, and an emergency power option
Not ideal for: Buyers who expect built-in Wi-Fi, remote internet access without extra hardware, or a fit for doors outside its listed dimensions
- Unlock methods:Fingerprint, PIN code, Bluetooth app, compatible RFID key fob, mechanical key
- Connectivity:Bluetooth; remote internet control requires a compatible Wi-Fi Gateway sold separately
- Material:Zinc alloy
- Door thickness:1-3/8 to 2-1/4 inches
- Door bore:2-1/8 inches
- Backset:2-3/8 or 2-3/4 inches
- Power:Four AA batteries; not included
- Emergency power:Micro-USB port
- Warranty:One year
Our verdict“Choose the Sifely S if local Bluetooth management, multiple entry methods, and emergency USB power matter more than built-in remote access.”
TEEHO TE001 Keyless Entry Keypad Deadbolt, Matte Black
The TEEHO TE001 is a straightforward fit for buyers who want keypad access and temporary digital entry without app setup or a Wi-Fi connection. Its capacity for 20 user codes plus a one-time guest code suits households that need separate everyday codes and a short-lived code for a visitor. Compared with the Yamiry YR04, it adds adjustable auto-lock timing from 10 to 99 seconds and anti-peeping code protection, though both rely on keypad entry rather than app-managed remote access. One-touch locking and IP54 weather resistance add practical convenience at an exterior door. The tradeoff is a narrower smart-access feature set: there is no listed app, fingerprint, or remote control, and its 54 mm door-hole requirement rules out 38 mm openings. I’d choose it for simple local access, not connected home control.
Pros:- Stores up to 20 user codes and supports a one-time guest code.
- Adjustable auto-lock and one-touch locking simplify daily use.
- IP54 weather resistance and anti-peeping code protection.
- Designed for screwdriver installation and includes two backup keys.
Cons:- Does not offer app-based or remote access in the supplied product details.
- Requires four AA batteries, which are not included.
- Fits 54 mm door holes and is not compatible with 38 mm holes.
Best for: Households that want separate keypad codes and a one-use guest code without app or Wi-Fi management.
Not ideal for: Buyers who need remote access, fingerprint entry, or a lock that fits a 38 mm door hole.
- Model:TE001
- Access codes:Up to 20 user codes plus a one-time guest code
- Auto-lock delay:10–99 seconds; off by default
- Power:4 AA batteries, not included
- Battery life:Up to 365 days
- Weather resistance:IP54
- Door hole size:2-1/8 in (54 mm); not compatible with 38 mm holes
- Construction:Aluminum alloy
Our verdict“Choose the TE001 if you want uncomplicated keypad entry and temporary guest codes, but skip it if remote digital-key management is a priority.”
Yamiry YR05 Fingerprint Smart Door Knob Lock
The Yamiry YR05 stands apart from keypad-only picks such as the TEEHO TE001 by offering five entry methods: app, password, key fob, fingerprint, and physical key. That variety helps when household members prefer different ways to enter, and its capacity for 50 passwords and fingerprints leaves room for a larger group. The key distinction for digital-key shoppers is connectivity: app control uses Bluetooth, while remote control requires a separately sold Wi-Fi gateway. Without that add-on, this is a local-access lock rather than a direct remote-management option like the Schlage Encode. Its knob format and screwdriver installation may suit buyers replacing a compatible existing knob, but the supplied details do not list door measurements. I’d pick it for flexible entry at the door, not for dependable away-from-home access out of the box.
Pros:- Provides five entry methods, including fingerprint and physical-key access.
- Stores up to 50 passwords and fingerprints.
- Includes two key fobs and two physical keys.
- Designed for screwdriver installation on most American standard doors.
Cons:- Remote control requires a separately sold Wi-Fi gateway.
- App control connects over Bluetooth, limiting access to nearby use without the gateway.
- Product data does not specify door-thickness or bore-hole compatibility.
Best for: Households with several users who want fingerprint, keypad, fob, and Bluetooth app entry at a compatible standard door.
Not ideal for: Buyers who need remote access without extra hardware or prefer a deadbolt with clearly specified door measurements.
- Model:YR05
- Unlock methods:App, password, key fob, fingerprint, physical key
- Connectivity:Bluetooth
- Storage capacity:50 passwords and fingerprints
- Remote control:Requires a separately sold Wi-Fi gateway
- Material:Aluminum
- Dimensions:5.62 x 2.69 x 3 in
- Included access items:2 physical keys and 2 key fobs
Our verdict“Choose the YR05 for varied local entry methods and fingerprint capacity, but choose a Wi-Fi-connected model if remote access matters immediately.”
Veise VE027 Wi-Fi Smart Lock with Fingerprint Keyless Entry, Matte Black
The Veise VE027 is the most access-flexible choice in this group for buyers who want remote digital-key management without purchasing a separate hub: it connects directly to 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi and supports app, fingerprint, PIN, voice, card, and physical-key entry. That makes it a broader connected option than the Yamiry YR05, whose remote control needs an additional gateway. Its capacity for 100 or more PIN codes and 20 or more fingerprints is useful for a busy household or rotating guests, while encrypted local storage and anti-peep PIN entry add protective features. The tradeoff is more setup and compatibility homework than the simpler TEEHO TE001: Wi-Fi must be 2.4 GHz, and door thickness and hole sizes must match its stated range. Eight batteries are also not included.
Pros:- Connects directly to 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi without a separate hub.
- Supports app, fingerprint, PIN, voice, card, and physical-key access.
- Offers 100+ PIN codes and 20+ fingerprints with remote access management.
- Includes encrypted local storage, anti-peep PIN entry, and a USB-C backup power port.
Cons:- Requires a 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi network.
- Eight batteries are not included.
- Door thickness and hole diameters must fall within specified compatibility ranges.
Best for: Connected households that want direct Wi-Fi remote management plus fingerprint, PIN, card, and voice-assistant access.
Not ideal for: Buyers with a 5 GHz-only network, an out-of-range door, or a preference for a simple keypad-only lock.
- Model:VE027
- Connectivity:2.4 GHz Wi-Fi and Bluetooth
- Access methods:App, fingerprint, PIN, voice assistant, authorized administrator, IC card, physical key
- Capacity:20+ fingerprints and 100+ PIN codes
- Auto-lock interval:10–180 seconds
- Security:AES-encrypted local storage; anti-peep PIN; lockout after 10 incorrect attempts for 3 minutes
- Weather resistance:IP65
- Door compatibility:1-3/8 to 1-3/4 in thick; 1-1/2 or 2-1/8 in hole diameter
- Power:8 batteries, not included; Type-C backup power port
Our verdict“Pick the VE027 if you want hub-free remote access and several digital-key options, provided your network and door meet its requirements.”
Schlage Encode WiFi Smart Deadbolt with Century Trim, Matte Black
The Schlage Encode earns its place for buyers who want digital access codes they can manage remotely, with built-in Wi-Fi rather than a separately purchased gateway. Through the Schlage Home app, owners can manage up to 100 access codes, check lock history, and receive notifications—capabilities the keypad-focused TEEHO TE001 does not list. A touchscreen keypad keeps entry straightforward for people who do not want to rely on a phone, while the built-in alarm, auto-lock, voice-assistant compatibility, and physical key provide useful alternatives. Compared with the more access-method-heavy Veise VE027, Encode prioritizes app-managed codes and monitoring over fingerprint or card entry. Its main compromise is battery upkeep: the listed typical life is up to six months, and remote or voice features depend on the app, Wi-Fi, and compatible devices.
Pros:- Built-in Wi-Fi supports remote locking and access-code management without an extra hub.
- Stores up to 100 access codes and provides lock history and notifications.
- Includes a touchscreen keypad, built-in alarm, and auto-lock.
- Works with Alexa and Google Home and includes a physical backup key.
Cons:- Typical battery life is listed as up to six months.
- Remote and voice features require the app, a secure Wi-Fi connection, and compatible devices.
- Does not list fingerprint or card entry among its access methods.
Best for: Homeowners who want app-managed guest codes, lock history, and notifications through built-in Wi-Fi.
Not ideal for: Buyers who prioritize fingerprint or card entry, longer stated battery life, or app-free remote features.
- Model:BE489WBCEN622
- Connectivity:Built-in Wi-Fi
- Access codes:Up to 100
- Voice assistants:Alexa and Google Home
- Power:Four included AA batteries
- Battery life:Up to six months with typical use
- Door thickness:1-3/8 to 1-3/4 in
- Backset:2-3/8 or 2-3/4 in
- Backup entry:One physical key
Our verdict“Choose the Encode if remote code management and entry history matter more than fingerprint access or extended battery intervals.”
Yamiry YR04 Keypad Smart Door Knob Lock
The Yamiry YR04 is a practical pick for replacing a compatible door knob with code entry, rather than adding app-based digital keys. Its keypad stores up to 20 user codes, supports one-time guest codes, and has backlit buttons for entry in low light. Auto-lock can be set from 5 to 99 seconds or disabled, giving it more timing flexibility than the TEEHO TE001, whose stated range begins at 10 seconds. Both are local keypad options, but the YR04 uses a knob format and includes two physical keys. Its IP54 weather resistance suits exposed-door use, though the product details do not list app connectivity, remote control, or fingerprint access. I’d favor it for simple household code access; buyers seeking connected digital-key sharing should look instead at the Schlage Encode or Veise VE027.
Pros:- Stores up to 20 user codes and supports one-time guest codes.
- Adjustable auto-lock from 5 to 99 seconds, with an option to disable it.
- Backlit keypad, low-battery indicator, and two physical backup keys.
- IP54 weather resistance and screwdriver installation.
Cons:- Product details do not list app connectivity or remote code management.
- Does not list fingerprint or other biometric access.
- Keypad codes must be 4–8 digits.
Best for: Homeowners replacing a compatible knob who want user and one-time guest codes with adjustable auto-lock.
Not ideal for: Buyers who need remote app access, fingerprint entry, or a deadbolt-style lock.
- Model:YR04
- Lock type:Keypad door knob
- User codes:Up to 20, plus one-time guest codes
- Code length:4–8 digits
- Auto-lock timing:5–99 seconds
- Weather resistance:IP54
- Material:Aluminum alloy
- Backup keys:2 physical keys
- Dimensions:5.62 x 2.7 x 3 in
Our verdict“Choose the YR04 for local keypad access on a compatible knob, but select a connected deadbolt if remote digital keys are your main goal.”
Veise VE06-L Smart Deadbolt Lock with Two Lever Handles, Matte Black
The Veise VE06-L makes digital keys practical for a busy household or rental: guests can use app access, e-keys, keypad codes, or the included IC cards, while physical keys remain available as backup. Its capacity for 250+ codes and 1,000+ cards suits frequent user turnover better than the Philips 4200 Series, whose listed access options emphasize fingerprints and PIN types rather than card capacity. Adjustable auto-lock and privacy, passage, and silent modes add useful control over everyday entry.
The tradeoff is that remote management and voice control require a separate G2 gateway, so it is less ready for connected access than the Yale Assure Lock 2, which connects to Wi-Fi without a hub. Its Grade 3 certification and IP54 weather resistance are practical, but buyers must match the door’s thickness and bore dimensions to the listed fit.
Pros:- Offers app, e-key, code, IC card, Apple Watch, and physical-key entry
- Large stated capacity of 250+ codes and 1,000+ IC cards
- Adjustable auto-lock plus privacy, passage, and silent modes
- IP54 weather resistance and specified local AES encryption
Cons:- Remote access and voice control require the separately sold G2 gateway
- Grade 3 certification is a lower stated grade than the Yale Assure Lock 2’s Grade 2
- Door compatibility depends on matching its listed thickness and bore sizes
Best for: Households, small offices, or rental hosts who need many separately managed codes and card-based entry alongside app access.
Not ideal for: Buyers who want remote access and voice control out of the box, or whose doors fall outside the specified thickness and hole dimensions.
- Model:VE06-L
- Entry methods:App, codes, web portal, IC cards, e-key, physical key, Apple Watch
- Access capacity:250+ codes; 1,000+ IC cards
- Auto-lock delay:5–900 seconds
- Construction and finish:Zinc alloy; matte black
- Weather resistance and certification:IP54; BHMA/ANSI Grade 3
- Door compatibility:1-3/8–2 in thick; 1-1/2 or 2-1/8 in hole diameter
- Gateway requirement:G2 gateway sold separately for remote access and voice control
Our verdict“Choose the VE06-L if you need flexible digital keys for many people and are willing to add a gateway for remote management.”
Veise VE017 Fingerprint Smart Door Lock with App Control, Matte Black
The Veise VE017 is a strong fit when a quick biometric digital key matters more than a hub-free setup. Its self-learning fingerprint reader is specified to recognize prints in under 0.2 seconds, and app, code, fob card, and mechanical-key access give household members alternatives if they do not want to use a fingerprint. Compared with the Philips Wi-Fi Smart Keypad Deadbolt, the VE017 emphasizes fingerprint speed and metal construction, while the Philips connects directly to Wi-Fi for remote control without an added gateway.
Local AES128 encryption, privacy codes, an intrusion alarm, and temporary lockout add security controls, and the listed DIY installation avoids drilling. The catch is that remote access and voice-assistant integration depend on a separately sold G1 gateway. Batteries are also not included, and the promised battery life depends on using four alkaline AAs.
Pros:- Self-learning fingerprint recognition specified at under 0.2 seconds
- Multiple alternatives, including app, fob card, code, and mechanical key
- AES128 local encryption, privacy code, intrusion alarm, and temporary lockout
- DIY installation with door-handedness detection and USB-C emergency power
Cons:- Remote access and Alexa or Google Assistant integration require a separate G1 gateway
- Four AA batteries are not included
- Fingerprint-centered entry may be less convenient for visitors who need a temporary code or card
Best for: Families who prefer fingerprint entry for daily use but want app, card, code, and key alternatives for guests or backup.
Not ideal for: Buyers who want hub-free remote management or voice assistant control, or who need batteries included with the lock.
- Model:VE017
- Entry methods:Fingerprint, app, fob card, code, code sharing, voice assistant with G1 gateway, mechanical key
- Fingerprint recognition:Self-learning AI; under 0.2 seconds
- Security features:AES128 local encryption, anti-peeping privacy code, intrusion alarm, temporary lockout
- Auto-lock:0–180 seconds
- Power:Four AA/LR6 alkaline batteries, not included; USB-C emergency port
- Construction and weather resistance:All-zinc alloy; IP55
- Smart home integration:Alexa and Google Assistant via separately sold Veise G1 Gateway
Our verdict“Pick the VE017 if fast fingerprint access is your priority and you accept buying a gateway for remote features.”
Philips Wi-Fi Smart Keypad Deadbolt with Fingerprint Reader and Lever Handle
The Philips Wi-Fi Smart Keypad Deadbolt pairs fingerprint entry with direct 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi, so app control and activity logs do not depend on a separate hub. That makes it a more straightforward remote-access choice than the Veise VE017, whose remote features require a separately sold gateway. Fingerprints, PINs, app access, voice control, and a physical key cover different household preferences, while storage for up to 50 fingerprints accommodates a family or small group.
Its app-configured auto-lock can help reduce forgotten-lock worries, and the lever handles make it a complete lock-and-handle set. The tradeoffs are its 2.4 GHz-only Wi-Fi and requirement for eight AA batteries, sold separately. Unlike the Yale Assure Lock 2, which offers Apple Watch access and scheduled codes, this Philips puts its emphasis on biometric entry and direct Wi-Fi.
Pros:- Connects directly to 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi without a hub
- Combines fingerprint, PIN, app, voice, and physical-key entry
- Stores up to 50 fingerprints and supports temporary PIN codes
- Includes lever handles and supports either door handing
Cons:- Requires eight AA alkaline batteries, which are sold separately
- Wi-Fi connectivity is limited to 2.4 GHz
- Fingerprint capacity is limited to 50 users, unlike the Veise VE06-L’s large stated card capacity
Best for: Households that want fingerprint entry, remote app access, and activity logs without buying a separate connectivity hub.
Not ideal for: Buyers whose router does not support 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi or who want Apple Watch entry and scheduled access codes.
- Model:DDL241X-1HW-L-M
- Entry methods:Fingerprint, PIN code, app, voice control, physical key
- Fingerprint capacity:Up to 50 fingerprints
- Connectivity:2.4 GHz Wi-Fi and Bluetooth
- Voice assistants:Amazon Alexa and Google Assistant
- Auto-lock delay:10–180 seconds
- Door compatibility:1-3/8–2 in thick; left- or right-handed
- Power:Eight AA alkaline batteries, sold separately
Our verdict“Choose this Philips if you want biometric entry and hub-free remote access, provided your Wi-Fi is 2.4 GHz and you supply the batteries.”
Yale Assure Lock 2 Wi-Fi Smart Deadbolt with Keypad
The Yale Assure Lock 2 is the most compelling choice here for managing digital keys over time: its app supports unlimited access codes that can be shared, scheduled, and revoked. Direct 2.4 or 5 GHz Wi-Fi means remote control does not require a separate hub, unlike the Veise VE06-L and VE017. Keypad, smartphone, Apple Watch, and backup-key access also give residents several ways in without centering the lock on fingerprint recognition.
DoorSense and Auto-Lock add a useful distinction: the lock can report door status and help secure the door after it closes. Its Grade 2 certification and broad operating-temperature range suit a front entry better than the Grade 3 Veise VE06-L on the stated certification. The main constraints are fit—the listed bore and spacing matter—and app remote control is specified for the US and Canada. It also lacks the Philips models’ fingerprint entry.
Pros:- Unlimited access codes can be shared, scheduled, and revoked
- 2.4 or 5 GHz Wi-Fi enables remote control without a hub or bridge
- Apple Watch, keypad, app, and backup-key entry options
- DoorSense, Auto-Lock, and BHMA Grade 2 certification
Cons:- Remote app control is listed as available only in the US and Canada
- Requires a 2-1/8-inch bore hole and specified door thickness and spacing
- Does not offer the fingerprint entry found on both Philips picks and the Veise VE017
Best for: Households or property managers who need many app-managed codes with schedules and revocation, plus hub-free remote access.
Not ideal for: Buyers who want fingerprint unlocking, live outside the listed US and Canada app-service areas, or have a door that misses the specified dimensions.
- Model:YRD410-WF1-619
- Entry methods:Keypad, smartphone app, Apple Watch, backup key
- Access codes:Unlimited; shareable, schedulable, and revocable
- Connectivity:2.4 or 5 GHz Wi-Fi; no hub or bridge required
- Door compatibility:1-3/4–2-1/4 in thick; 2-1/8 in bore; 4 in minimum center-to-center spacing
- Certification:BHMA Grade 2
- Operating temperature:-22°F to 140°F
- Lock management:DoorSense, Auto-Unlock, and Auto-Lock
Our verdict“Choose the Yale if scheduled, revocable digital codes and hub-free remote control matter more than fingerprint access.”
Philips 4200 Series WiFi Keypad Deadbolt with Handle
The Philips 4200 Series stands out for the variety of PIN arrangements it supports: permanent, one-time, periodic, and recurring codes give owners different ways to grant digital-key access. It also connects directly to 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi without a hub and adds app, fingerprint, and voice-assistant entry. Compared with the Yale Assure Lock 2, the Philips adds fingerprint access and a matching handle set, while Yale is the stronger choice for unlimited scheduled and revocable app codes and supports both 2.4 and 5 GHz Wi-Fi.
The fingerprint reader is specified at 0.3 seconds, but the lock’s listed battery life is up to six months, and batteries are not included. Auto-lock is also off by default, so it needs app setup before it can secure the door automatically. Fit is narrower than some alternatives: it is listed for doors 1-3/8 to 1-3/4 inches thick, with router distance guidance of 33 feet.
Pros:- Supports permanent, one-time, periodic, and recurring PIN codes
- Direct 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi connection without a hub
- Fingerprint, app, PIN, and voice-assistant access
- Includes two matching door levers and app status checks
Cons:- Batteries are not included, and stated battery life is up to six months
- Auto-lock is off by default and must be enabled in the app
- Listed door thickness and Wi-Fi placement guidance may limit installation options
Best for: Homeowners who want direct Wi-Fi, fingerprint entry, and several PIN formats for household members and occasional visitors.
Not ideal for: Buyers with doors thicker than 1-3/4 inches, routers more than 33 feet away, or a preference for longer listed battery life and auto-lock enabled by default.
- Model:4200 Series DDL242X-1HW-L
- Connectivity:2.4 GHz Wi-Fi; no hub required
- Access methods:App, PIN codes, fingerprint, voice assistant
- PIN code types:Permanent, one-time, periodic, recurring
- Fingerprint recognition:0.3 seconds
- Auto-lock:0–180 seconds; off by default
- Battery life and type:Up to 6 months; standard 1.5 V alkaline batteries, not included
- Door compatibility:1-3/8–1-3/4 in thick; right-opening by default, adjustable for left-opening doors
Our verdict“Pick the Philips 4200 Series if multiple PIN types and fingerprint access suit your household and your door fits its narrower specifications.”
How We Picked
I ranked these locks by how well their advertised access methods serve the central need behind this roundup: managing entry with digital credentials. I weighed phone and app access, keypad or fingerprint options, built-in Wi-Fi where specified, and the practical value of backup entry. I also treated the lock’s form as a key buying factor: a deadbolt, a knob, and a full lock-and-handle set solve different installation needs and cannot be swapped without checking the door.
The order favors clear everyday utility and fewer added setup decisions, which puts the Schlage Encode first, followed by the Yale Assure Lock 2 and versatile Philips options. Models with fingerprints or bundled handles rank well for buyers who will use those features, but extra access methods are not automatically better if they add complexity or do not fit the door. Product descriptions do not establish every detail of connectivity, compatibility, or backup operation, so I treat those as verification points rather than assumed benefits. Lower-ranked picks can still be the better choice for a specific format, entry method, or simpler keypad use.
Factors to Consider When Choosing Best Smart Locks With Digital Keys
A digital key can mean an app credential, a keypad code, a fingerprint, or a combination of these. I would start with how people actually enter your home, then check the lock format and connectivity before comparing extra features. Those steps help avoid choosing a capable lock that does not fit your door or does not support the access method you expected.
Decide Which Digital Credential You Will Actually Use
App access is useful when you want to manage entry from a phone, while a keypad works for family members or guests who should not need an app. Fingerprint entry can reduce the need to carry a phone or remember a code, but it depends on a reader that suits the people using it. More methods can add convenience, yet they can also mean more settings and user credentials to manage. Pick one primary method and treat the others as backups or special-use options. A common mistake is buying for a feature list rather than the routines of everyone who needs to enter.
Check What Wi-Fi Access Means for Remote Control
Bluetooth or local app control does not automatically mean you can operate the lock when away from home. If remote management matters, confirm that the exact model has built-in Wi-Fi or identify any required hub or bridge before buying. Built-in connectivity can simplify the setup, but it also makes network reliability and battery use part of the ownership picture. If you only need codes at the door, paying for remote features may add little value. Read the product’s connectivity requirements rather than relying on the word “smart.”
Match the Lock Format to Your Existing Door
A deadbolt replacement, a smart knob, and a lock set with a lever or handle are not interchangeable projects. Check whether the door already has a separate deadbolt, what hardware you want to replace, and whether the new set’s dimensions suit the door. A handle bundle can be convenient when you are replacing several pieces at once, but it may be unnecessary if your existing handle is staying. Also confirm door thickness, backset, handing, and any stated installation limits. Measuring first is easier than discovering that a feature-rich lock is the wrong shape for the entry.
Plan for Backup Entry and Battery Upkeep
Digital entry should not leave you without a plan when batteries run low, a phone is unavailable, or connectivity fails. Check which fallback methods the exact model supports, such as a physical key, keypad, or another local access route. The product name alone may not spell out every backup detail, so verify it in the specifications and instructions. Think about who can respond if the lock needs attention while you are away. A simpler model with a clear fallback can be more reassuring than one with more unlocking modes but unclear recovery steps.
Choose Access Management for Your Household
Consider how many people need entry and how often codes or credentials will change. A household with regular visitors may value the ability to issue and remove access without sharing a permanent code, while a small household may prefer fewer settings. For rentals or shared homes, confirm whether the app supports the credential management you need; do not assume every smart lock handles temporary access in the same way. Fingerprint access also raises a practical question: whether every user is comfortable enrolling and using it. Match the management tools to your real turnover, not a hypothetical one.
Pay for Features That Solve a Real Entry Problem
A premium connected deadbolt makes sense when remote access and app-based management are regular needs. A fingerprint model can be worthwhile when hands-free or key-free entry is a priority, while a keypad-focused lock may suit buyers who mainly want to stop carrying keys. Bundled handles can reduce the need to coordinate separate hardware, but only if their finish and fit work for the door. Avoid treating a larger feature list as a measure of security or reliability; those qualities require specific evidence for the model. Spend extra for a feature you will use, and verify the installation and connectivity details before you commit.
Frequently Asked Questions
Do all smart locks with digital keys let me unlock the door remotely?
No. A keypad or fingerprint reader provides digital entry at the door, but remote operation depends on the lock’s connectivity and app support. Check whether the exact model has built-in Wi-Fi or needs a separate hub, and confirm what remote features are included. If you only need household members to enter locally, remote access may not be necessary. If you need to manage access while away, treat connectivity as a core requirement rather than an extra.
Should I choose fingerprint entry or a keypad?
Choose based on who uses the door and how they prefer to enter. A keypad can work for guests and people who do not want to enroll a biometric credential, while fingerprint access may make everyday entry faster for regular users. Fingerprint recognition depends on the reader and successful enrollment, so it should not be your only planned route unless the model provides a fallback you are comfortable using. If different household members have different preferences, a lock with multiple access methods may make sense, provided the added setup is worthwhile.
Can I install a smart knob lock in place of my deadbolt?
Not necessarily. Knob locks and deadbolts occupy different positions and serve different roles, so replacing one does not automatically replace the other. Check the existing door hardware and the product’s stated installation requirements before ordering. A smart knob may suit a door where that is the intended locking point, while a deadbolt model is the more direct replacement for a separate deadbolt. If a product includes a handle or lever, confirm exactly which parts are included and which existing parts remain.
What should I check before buying a Wi-Fi smart lock?
Confirm whether Wi-Fi is built into the lock or requires a hub, then check that your home network reaches the door reliably. Review the app’s access-management features and the model’s stated battery and backup-entry details. Also verify door measurements and installation requirements, since connectivity cannot compensate for a poor physical fit. If your main goal is keypad access at the door, a Wi-Fi model may add complexity without solving a need. Choose connected features when remote control or credential management will be useful in your routine.
Is a lock with more unlocking methods always the better choice?
No. Additional options can help a household with varied needs, but each method may bring setup, credential management, or maintenance tasks. A straightforward keypad model can be a better match if you do not need fingerprints or remote app control. Before choosing a multi-method lock, identify which options will be used and check the backup route if the app, network, or reader is unavailable. The best fit is the one that provides reliable access for your household without features you will ignore.
Conclusion
For the strongest all-around fit in this comparison, I recommend the Schlage Encode WiFi Smart Deadbolt; its built-in Wi-Fi and familiar deadbolt format make it a practical starting point for connected entry. For a keypad-led experience, the Yale Assure Lock 2 is my pick for beginners, while the Yale Code Keypad Deadbolt and TEEHO TE001 suit buyers who want simpler keypad access rather than a long list of connected features. My premium-leaning choice is the Philips Wi-Fi Smart Keypad Deadbolt with Fingerprint Reader and Lever Handle for shoppers who want several entry methods and bundled hardware, provided the door fit and included features check out. For fingerprint-focused needs, compare the Philips fingerprint deadbolt with the Veise VE027 and Yamiry options; for a full handle replacement, start with the Philips or Veise sets. Before choosing, verify the exact model’s remote-access requirements, dimensions, and backup entry method.
